On 27 November 2013 22:29, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote: > On 26/11/13 17:28, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >> >> On 11/26/13 3:22 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: >>> >>> So, as other people have suggested, really the only thing we can >>> reasonably do is to define a separate Imaginary type >> >> >> I agree. Let's move forward with this. > > > I've started work, code is here: > https://github.com/WebDrake/phobos/tree/imaginary > > Feedback, forks/pull requests, etc. welcome.
That repo doesn't seem to exist (must by my imagination).