On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Walter Bright<newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote: > Bill Baxter wrote: >> >> I do think you make a convincing argument that in general lots of >> micro ifdefs everywhere is not the right approach. >> But I remain unconvinced that potential for abuse is a good reason to >> disallow finer scale version() statements. > > It's where the line between micro and fine is that you disagree with, not > the principle?
Yeh. Like in the case just mentioned -- version() around items in an enum sounds more reasonable to me than having to define the entire enum twice. --bb