Am Tue, 03 Dec 2013 16:30:10 +0100 schrieb "Joakim" <joa...@airpost.net>:
> On Tuesday, 3 December 2013 at 15:13:36 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote: > > Am Tue, 03 Dec 2013 12:26:57 +0100 > > schrieb "Joakim" <joa...@airpost.net>: > > > >> Seems like you got pretty far with your Android port: are you > >> planning on submitting any of these patches back upstream? > > > > At some point, probably yes. However, I want to get the 'easy' > > stuff > > working first. This means a stable and well-tested > > ARM/Linux/glibc > > build should be available first. (It makes more sense this way > > as we > > still have/had some ARM codegen bugs in the compiler.) > > OK, anything against putting your incomplete Android port online > someplace, say on github? I'm working on an Android/x86 port > now, that way we could work together and submit our patches > together. This would especially allay Iain's concerns about > future conflicts between Android/x86 and Android/ARM patches. My > work is publicly available here: > > https://github.com/joakim-noah/druntime/tree/android Sure, here's the code: Android stuff, but I guess 99% of it is obsolete now https://github.com/jpf91/GDC/commits/android NDK buildscripts integration: https://github.com/jpf91/ndk-build/commits/master But that stuff is really old and probably not very interesting. Here's the current ARM/GlibC work: https://github.com/jpf91/GDC/commits/arm