On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:52:10PM +0100, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: > On Tuesday, 10 December 2013 at 21:28:41 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote: > >Those are implementation issues, right? > > Yeah, a lot of the blame can be placed on the intertwined phobos > modules. D without phobos is a lot faster to compile (and produces > significantly smaller exes).
That's why I proposed reducing Phobos interdependencies. Didn't sound like it caught on, though. :-( T -- This sentence is false.