On 23 December 2013 11:05, bearophile <bearophileh...@lycos.com> wrote: > Iain Buclaw: > > >> For inline assembly, making dmd work better how? > > > I meant making dmd better in general. Faster floating point, more > optimization tricks, etc. > > > >> Not possible without some sort of translation map, which would be target >> specific, so not suitable for GDC, and language specific so not suitable >> for GCC either. >> >> Also, falls under category of x86-centric below. > > > Did you express such problems during the design phase of that > recent language feature? >
I'll answer that with a question. Did you really think that __simd went through a design phase? :-)
