On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 02:03 -0800, Walter Bright wrote: > On 12/22/2013 11:46 PM, Russel Winder wrote: > > Also interesting to note that -o- appears to do bizarre things with both > > DMD and LDC2 (not an issue for GDC of course). > > What are you expecting -o- to do? It is documented to suppress generation of > .o > files.
The questions I have are: Should -o- stop the creation of the final executable? Why is a file with the name of the final executable created? What I had inferred, perhaps erroneously, was that -o- would just avoid writing the .o files whilst creating the final executable. However neither DMD or LDC2 do this. LDC2 generates no files, whilst DMD generates a file with the name of the final executable but which is not an executable. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder