On 2013-12-28 16:40, Dicebot wrote:Usage of "@" for new keywords is just a matter of avoiding name clasheswith existing user code.That worked until we got UDA's with the same syntax.
I have deja vu - remember talking with you about exactly this topic in NG several months ago :) (My point was that it will still work if we make built-in attributes qualified with a reserved module name which is backwards-compatible change)