On Friday, 3 January 2014 at 09:35:54 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
Thanks, maybe I was too tired and do not read carefully the
captcha ;-).
Dne Fri, 03 Jan 2014 10:19:43 +0100 Vladimir Panteleev
<vladi...@thecybershadow.net> napsal(a):
On Thursday, 2 January 2014 at 20:14:58 UTC, Daniel Kozak
wrote:
F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing
captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha
F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing
captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha
F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha F***ing
captcha F***ing captcha F***ing captcha
Hi,
The forum software used to have a bug where if you failed the
first CAPTCHA, it would fail all successive CAPTCHA attempts
for that post submission. It appears to still be fixed, though.
I've tested CAPTCHA functionality just now, and it seems to be
working properly. I've tried about 5 times and only once I got
a challenge with an unclear solution. If you get a challenge
and you're not confident in your solution, it's better to
click the arrow-circle button to get a different challenge.
I've checked the logs for the past month, and it seems that,
with all the other spam-preventive measures in place, Akismet
is now more effective at generating false positives than at
actually blocking spam. (It has something against Mono-D in
particular, it seems.) I'm going to try sending feedback of
the false positives so far, hopefully that will "teach" it
that such posts are not spam. If that doesn't work, I'll
disable it entirely or look into replacing it with something
else.
They are obviously 'o' 'r' and 'k' most likely related to Git.
