This piece (recently seen on the Hacker News front page):

http://rust-class.org/pages/using-rust-for-an-undergraduate-os-course.html

.. includes a pretty damning assessment of D as "unsafe" (compared to Rust) and generally doomed. I remember hearing Walter Bright talking a lot about "safe code" during a D presentation. Was that about a different kind of safety? Is the author just wrong? Basically I want to hear the counterargument (if there is one).

Reply via email to