Nick Sabalausky wrote: > All of the following *individually* (ie, not just as a lump sum) are things > for which I've always considered well worth leaving C/C++ in the history > books where it belongs:
And if D had just one of these features, plus all of the useful features of C++, then I would be using D instead of C++. But every time I find that a useful C++ idiom has no equivalent in D (and every time D introduces a new wart on top of the ones it inherits from C++), I am knocked back into C++ land. -- Rainer Deyke - rain...@eldwood.com
