On 1/6/2014 1:03 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/6/2014 11:21 AM, deadalnix wrote:Or, we can decide that trapping in not guaranteed, and then dereferencing null is undefined behavior, which is much worse that a compile time failure.Realistically, this is a non-problem.
Or better, if you want to issue a pull request for the documentation that says unless it is a dead load, a null reference will cause a program-ending fault of one sort or another, I'll back it.
