On Sunday, 12 January 2014 at 16:48:08 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/12/14 3:02 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"Manu" <turkey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:mailman.334.1389499497.15871.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
I've just run into this again today. It's still very annoying.
Consider this a reminder? :)

AAs should be rolled back first, and these have been sitting there for a
couple of months.

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2856
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/668

Walter has decided that this coming release will only be bugfixes... kind of a useless thing to do for an open source project, as him refusing to review/merge my enhancement pulls doesn’t inspire me to work
on ‘actual bugs’.

If we're refraining from or delaying pulling contributions for undue reasons we're doing something wrong.

Andrei

The Release Process on the wiki[1] does not have a method for a
bugfix only release so it's definitely a problem. Both bugfixes
and features get merged into master.

The release process forbids cherry-picking between branches (some
rationale for this rule would be nice; it feels like a mistake to
me) so that can't be used to solve the problem. I don't think
there is a way to do a bugfix only release without cherry-picking.

If it were me, I'd just would have had both bugfixes and features
merge into master as described by the release process and have a
2.065 branch which a single person is responsible for
cherry-picking bugfixes into (alternatively you could have
whoever merges the bugfix into master do it).

Frankly, I think the described Release Process is much more
complicated than it needs to be. Fundamentally you only need two
branches at any given time: master and a release branch which
only exists after the feature freeze takes place for an upcoming
release (post-release the branch gets tagged, merged back into
master[2], and deleted).

It's a shame Github doesn't let you target multiple branches with
a pull request. That'd be a nice workflow during the short lived
feature freeze window.

1. http://wiki.dlang.org/Release_Process
2. Which, I found out by chance, never happens:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3080 This is
very bad as commits can easily get lost though I question whether
the release branch should ever be committed to directly.

Reply via email to