On 1/16/14 6:11 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 17 January 2014 at 02:04:27 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Yah, that would be expected.

Yeah, but I think people would find it weird. This kind of thing is
actually possible today:

class Foo { }

class Bar {
         Foo foo = new Foo(); // this gets a static reference into the
typeinfo.init (since new Foo is evaluated at compile time!) which is
blitted over...
}

That wouldn't be allowed.

Andrei

Reply via email to