Walter Bright wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
This "D" programming language is great because it obviates make.
Ok, now about make's ability to switch compilers without having to edit
config files?
I don't do it that way. I can't imagine when you would mix D1 and D2 in
a single build.
Instead, I have a set of trivial scripts to change the symlink for the
'dmd' directory. Nothing else needs to be aware of the compiler version.
From then on, I just use bud.
I'll be pretty annoyed if the D2 compiler changes its name to DMD2.
