On Saturday, 18 January 2014 at 21:05:02 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/17/2014 7:05 AM, Michel Fortin wrote:Some more thoughts.The postfix ? has parsing issues with ?: expressions.Aside from that, non-null is only one case of a universe of types that are subsets of other types. I'd prefer a more general solution.
I was thinking about defining reference types (classes, interfaces) as considered non nullable in @safe . It is still possible to encapsulate null in Nullable!T .
