Rainer Deyke wrote:
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Maybe what scares Walter is a whole new syntax for properties. If at
least you could say which functions are properties and which are not,
that would be a small change and it'll make it possible for other
things. Something like:
int property foo(); // getter
int property foo(int value); // setter
My proposal requires no new keywords and no new syntax:
int getfoo(); // getter
int setfoo(int); // setter
This is pretty clean, and in keep with the opXxx approach. Actually how
about defining property foo by defining opGet_foo and opSet_foo.
Andrei
