"Walter Bright" wrote in message news:ldksbk$1pcn$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 2/14/2014 2:22 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> And until that is complete, there is no reliable way to filter out D1
> bugs. I've
> been marking them with "(D1 only)", so I know at least those ones are
> actually
> D1 bugs.
Do a search for "D2" and "D1 & D2".
That excludes the bugs marked any of "2.000", "2.002", "2.003", "2.004",
"2.005", "2.006", "2.007", "2.008", "2.009", "2.010", "2.011", "2.012",
"2.013", "2.014", "2.015", "2.016", "2.017", "2.018", "2.029", "2.020",
"2.021", "2.022", "2.023", "2.024", "2.025", "2.026", "2.027", "2.028",
"2.029", "2.030", "unspecified", "2.031", "2.032", "2.033", "2.034",
"2.035", "2.036", "2.037", "2.038", "2.039", "2.040" or "2.041".
Any even better, it falsely exludes the bugs marked as "D1*" that are from
before D2 existed and not necessarily exclusive to D1.
> Is sociomantic _actually_ using D1 phobos and caring if those bugs get
> fixed?
To reiterate, the D1 bugzilla issues stay as long as Sociomantic is using
D1.
Oh look, Don says I was right and they're not using phobos1.
