On Monday, 17 February 2014 at 00:27:44 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Monday, 17 February 2014 at 00:22:52 UTC, Casper Færgemand
wrote:
What about new evolved switch statement, called something as
to not confuse it with C syntax? It could be a simple rewrite
thing.
mysteryswitch (some expression) {
case 1: some statement;
case 2 .. 4: some other statement;
}
could rewrite to
switch (some expression) {
case 1: some statement; break;
case 2: .. case 4: some other statement; break;
default: break;
}
I like 'match' as Rust has:
----
match (some expression) {
case 1: some statement;
case 2 .. 4: some other statement;
}
----
+1, I linked this "match". How a name does the difference. I
suggest to implement this one instead of. I think that it's very
nice because don't make nobody confusing anymore or break D
philosofy. some-statement should have an implicit 'break'
generated by the compiler just like Pascal cases have (and rust I
guess)
