On Friday, 21 February 2014 at 12:12:17 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.lexer

First of all, thank you for the great work. This is a very important project.

I'll begin with reviewing the documentation.

Summary

Some simple explanation of the terminology and concepts would be nice. At least a link to Wikipedia.

Create the string array costants for your language.

Typo ("costants")

Examples:

An inline complete example of a very simple language would be nice.

A lexer for D is available here.

Although good to have, this is too much to take in all at once, for documentation purposes.

A lexer for Lua is available here.

Nary a comment in sight. This might serve as the example lexer if only it was better commented. The comments can be copy-pasted from the module documentation, even that would make the code much easier to grok.

Template Parameter Definitions

What does this mean? Parameters to what template?

Can this section be moved to inside the documentation of Lexer, and Lexer be moved to the first documented symbol in the file?

A function that serves as the default token lexing function. For most languages this will be the identifier lexing function.

Should the function signature and contracts be explained here?

This function must return bool and take a single size_t argument representing the number of bytes to skip over before looking for a separating character.

I think it's better to describe the signature in D syntax rather than English.

A listing of tokens whose value is variable, such as whitespace, identifiers, number literals, and string literals.

No mention of how the list is represented (is it an array? what type of elements should the array have? how are the array values used?), the reader is left to figure that out from the example below.

Template for determining the type used for a token type. Selects the smallest unsigned integral type that is able to hold the value staticTokens.length + dynamicTokens.length + possibleDefaultTokens.length. For example if there are 20 static tokens, 30 dynamic tokens, and 10 possible default tokens, this template will alias itself to ubyte, as 20 + 30 + 10 < ubyte.max.

Should this be documented? I understand that this will be instantiated only once, by std.lexer.

Utility declarations should preferably be at the end of the module, so that they appear last in the documentation.

Generates the token type identifier for the given symbol. There are two special cases:

Are these magic constants necessary? Why not declare them as enums?

In all cases this template will alias itself to a constant of type IdType. This template will fail at compile time if symbol is not one of the staticTokens, dynamicTokens, or possibleDefaultTokens.

Style nit: D symbols should be wrapped in the $D(...) macro.

== overload for the the token type.

Is it really necessary to document opEquals?

But since it's here: how does it interact with extraFields?

The Column number at which this token occurs.

There was a lot of bikeshedding regarding the correct terminology to use when adding -vcolumns to DMD ( https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3077 ). I think the documentation should at least mention what exactly it is counting.

A function that serves as the default token lexing function. For most languages this will be the identifier lexing function.

What should the function's name be? How will it interact with Lexer? (It's not clear that this refers to the defaultTokenFunction parameter, especially after the previous list item, popFront, is a different piece of the puzzle.)

The documentation for Lexer's arguments seem to be thrown all around the module. I suggest to document them only once, all in Lexer's DDoc, add example signatures, and move Lexer to the top of the module.

Examples:
struct CalculatorLexer

I think this should be expanded into a full, well-documented example featured in the module DDoc.

_popFront();

Where did that come from? Perhaps you meant Lexer's DDoc to say "which should call this mixin's _popFront()", and the DDoc escaped the _ character? If so, why not use a named mixin to disambiguate instead of _?

struct LexerRange;
struct StringCache;

These are thoroughly documented, but will they be used by anything other than std.lexer?

Reply via email to