Jarrett Billingsley wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Daniel > Keep<daniel.keep.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Sorry, but you can't seriously claim D is still easy to implement whilst >> .stringof still exists in its current form. :P > > Oh, .stringof is nothing compared to the complexity added by string mixins ;) > > Or some of the scarier parsing issues. (Type).Identifier and the (int > x) { return x + 5; } delegates are two things that come to mind..
What's up with the last two? I haven't quite gotten to them in semantic yet, but I didn't notice any problems in parsing them