On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 16:32:18 UTC, Chris Williams
wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 16:08:26 UTC, Robert Clipsham
wrote:
D doesn't need this, you can implement monadic null checking
in the library:
By that argument, I can implement anything that D can do in
assembler, hence I don't need D.
I'm not sure I understand your point. I'm simply stating that in
D, right now, without adding any complexity to the language, you
can do:
just(myObject).method1().method2().method3()
Which would have the same effect as:
myObject?.method1()?.method2()?.method3()
in C#. Is a special operator really needed for this?
Robert
