On Wednesday, 5 March 2014 at 04:05:56 UTC, luminousone wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 March 2014 at 12:04:12 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 March 2014 at 12:01:46 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 March 2014 at 10:37:02 UTC, Steve Teale wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 March 2014 at 07:23:29 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
Perhaps you already figured this out but template mixins
can only mixin declarations, not expression or statements.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Damn! Yup, first sentence of the documentation. Wishful
reading.
Thanks.
Steve
You can of course mixin a function (either nested inside the
constructor or as a member or even a free funtion) containing
whatever you want and then call that.
That won't help you with calling super() though, you can only
call super from another constructor. You'd have to use a
string mixin as that truly can inject arbitrary code.
This opens a question:
Should functions nested in constructors be given all the same
powers that a constructor has (calling super, initializing
const/immutable data etc)?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3332
I don't see how that's relevant? The crux of that request/bug is
about overload resolution.