It was already far above the competition in the throughput
benchmark anyway. What exactly doesn't feel right to you?
On Friday, 7 March 2014 at 05:44:16 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On Thursday, 6 March 2014 at 17:17:12 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Well, I found out the other day that vibe.d compiles with gdc
now so I went back to see if it made any difference to the
benchmarks I had.
In throughput it made none.
In the latency one it was about 5-10% faster with gdc compared
to dmd, which is good, but it still didn't change the relative
positions of the languages.
So that was anti-climatic. :P
Atila
I'm suspecting that Vibe's performance is heavily based upon
the systems state i.e. hdd. Not so much on the code generation.
I don't know where we can get more performance out of it. But
something doesn't quite feel right.
