07-Mar-2014 21:34, H. S. Teoh пишет:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 05:24:59PM +0000, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Friday, 7 March 2014 at 03:52:42 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Ok, I have a plan. Each step will be separated by at least one
version:
1. implement decode() as an algorithm for string types, so one can
write:
string s;
s.decode.algorithm...
suggest that people start doing that instead of:
s.algorithm...
I think .decode should be something more explicit (byCodePoint
OSLT), just so it's clear that it's not magical and does not solve
all problems.
+1. I think "byCodePoint" is far more self-documenting and less
misleading than "decode".
string s;
s.byCodePoint.algorithm...
I'm already starting to like it.
And there is precedent, see std.uni.byCodepoint ;)
--
Dmitry Olshansky
