Lars T. Kyllingstad Wrote: > Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > > I have a dream. > > > > * Parameterless functions still can be called without "()". People will > > realize that it's a prejudice to believe that this impedes code > > understanding, and their eyes and wrists will thank them. > > > > * The syntax "foo = bar" is rewritten into "foo(bar)" IF AND ONLY IF the > > expression "auto __x = foo, __x = bar" is compilable. > > > I like this. Would it also make sense to require that the getter is > declared as const or immutable?
Not quite. See DIP2.