"Manu" <turkey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:mailman.128.1394856947.23258.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
> Haven't we already agreed a pragma for force inline should be
> implemented. Or is
> that something I have dreamed?
It's been discussed. I never agreed to it (I _really_ don't like it), but
I'll take it if it's the best
I'm gonna get.
I don't like stateful attributes like that. I think it's error prone,
especially when it's silent.
'private:' for instance will complain if you write a new function in an
area influenced by the
private state and try and call it from elsewhere; ie, you know you made
the mistake.
If you write a new function in an area influenced by the forceinline state
which wasn't intended
to be inlined, you won't know. I think that's dangerous.
Huh? The pragma could easily be restricted to apply to exactly one function
declaration, if that's what's desired.
