On 03/17/2014 11:43 PM, Timon Gehr wrote: > No, it does not. The lexer does not need to change. you're right, but at some distant future I would like .. to be replaced by :
- Re: DIP58: ".." as a Binary Operat... H. S. Teoh
- Re: DIP58: ".." as a Binary Operat... Mason McGill
- Re: DIP58: ".." as a Binary Operator Asman01
- Re: DIP58: ".." as a Binary Operator Meta
- Re: DIP58: ".." as a Binary Operator Mason McGill
- Re: DIP58: ".." as a Binary Operator Robert Schadek
- Re: DIP58: ".." as a Binary Operator H. S. Teoh
- Re: DIP58: ".." as a Binary Operat... Robert Schadek
- Re: DIP58: ".." as a Binary Op... H. S. Teoh
- Re: DIP58: ".." as a Binary Op... Timon Gehr
- Re: DIP58: ".." as a Binar... Robert Schadek
- Re: DIP58: ".." as a Binar... Ola Fosheim Grøstad
- Re: DIP58: ".." as a Binary Operat... Rainer Schuetze
- Re: DIP58: ".." as a Binary Operator Mason McGill
- Re: DIP58: ".." as a Binary Operator deadalnix