On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 19:48:45 -0400, Walter Bright
<newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote:
On 3/18/2014 4:20 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
In a recent (well, recently pulled anyway) pull request that Monarch
Dodra
brought up, we debated what should be considered nothrow in the depths
of druntime.
There's a lot of low hanging nothrow fruit in druntime that doesn't need
analysis, it just needs to get done:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12389
Can we mark _d_monitorenter and _d_monitorexit nothrow and have the
compiler see that when using synchronized? This was the hurdle we couldn't
overcome in the referenced pull request.
Should those be marked nothrow? What about pure and @safe?
-Steve
