On Wednesday, 26 March 2014 at 04:05:10 UTC, Philippe Sigaud
wrote:
No, I think I mentioned that string mixins can't get the
context they are
inserted in. Why would I simply wrap a string mixin around a
template mixin
if there wasn't some purpose that string mixins couldn't use
in the first
place?
OK. I just preferred to ask, to be sure.
Hence you can't do both. Use string mixins and you got to
supply the
argument. Use template mixins and you can't overload
properly(which makes it
useless in my case). If one could evaluate the string mixin
after the
template mixin then it would all work. (and yes, it is the
solution I want
unless you can actually come up with something that solves the
problem
directly(both overloads properly and allows one to get the
context)
One can't do something like
template B(T = typeof(this))
{
}
Did you try using a this template parameter?
doesn't work. You can't use this in string mixins. There is no
context.
