On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 04:30:36PM +0000, John Stahara wrote: > On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:23:11 +0000, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: > > > On Friday, 28 March 2014 at 09:30:25 UTC, Regan Heath wrote: > >> On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 08:59:34 -0000, Paolo Invernizzi > >> <paolo.invernizzi@no.address> wrote: > >>> For what concern us, everyone here is happy with the fact that empty > >>> *must* be checked prior to front/popFront. > >> > >> This is actually not true. > >> > >> R > > > > What I'm meaning, it's that we don't care: we are always respecting > > the sequence "empty > front > pop", and everybody here find it > > natural. > > > To clarify for Mr. Invernizzi: the "we" to which he refers is the > group of people he works with, and /not/ the members of this > newsgroup. [...]
FWIW I find it perfectly natural as well. (But I know not everyone agrees. :P) T -- The two rules of success: 1. Don't tell everything you know. -- YHL
