On 4/16/2014 12:44 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
* Is it perhaps too early to introduce this? We don't have allocators yet, so it can be quite hard to avoid the GC in some situations.
Not that hard.
* Many Phobos functions use 'text' and 'format' in asserts. What should be done about those?
Redo to use output ranges instead.
* Does @nogc => nothrow?
No. They are orthogonal.
If I'm not mistaken, throw must through a GC-allocated Throwable. * If the above is true, does that mean exceptions cannot be used at all in @nogc code?
They can use preallocated exceptions, or be templatized and infer the attributes. It is a problem, though.
* I worry about the number of attributes being added. Where do we draw the line? Are we going to add every attribute that someone finds a use for? @logicalconst @nonrecursive @nonreentrant @guaranteedtermination @neverreturns
That's essentially true of every language feature.