On 17 April 2014 18:22, Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> Of course it was sold at WWDC as "ARC is better than GC" and not as "ARC > is better than the crappy GC implementation we have done". > The argument is, GC is not appropriate for various classes of software. It is unacceptable. No GC that anyone has yet imagined/proposed will address this fact. ARC offers a solution that is usable by all parties. We're not making comparisons between contestants or their implementation quality here, GC is not in the race.
