aarti_pl wrote: > [2],[3],[4] Choosing one of possible options will give you answer what > is preferred. Also introducing new syntax without removing ommitable > parenthesis feature doesn't make much sense, as it cause than there is > no real difference between function and property.
Just wanted to point out that yes, it does make sense. I don't agree with it, but it makes sense. Once properties are added the omissible parens can maybe save some typing on function calls, or whatever their advantages are (to be honest I forget why they are useful). It would be impossible to define a function and property of the same name, so no ambiguities would arise.
