On 2009-08-01 13:05:26 -0400, "Denis Koroskin" <2kor...@gmail.com> said:
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:04:43 +0400, Chad J
<chadj...@__spam.is.bad__gmail.com> wrote:
Omissible Parentheses
Could someone remind me why we don't remove these?
So far I have
- They save typing.
- Removing them breaks backwards compatibility.
- They allow some features of properties, but with a list of limitations
and gotchas.
This is not intended to be a deep discussion. I'm writing a piece on
properties, so I'm gathering information.
Andrei likes them.
I like them too, despite their gotchas. If they were not cause for
special rules when returning delegates, also classes and structs with
an opCall member, I'd want to keep them.
--
Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.com
http://michelf.com/
