On Saturday, 26 April 2014 at 20:07:25 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Yah, that's why something along the lines of
extern(C++) module facebook.folly;
comes to mind. Following such a module declaration, stuff
inside of it is considered inside C++ namespace facebook::folly.
The disadvantage of this is that it forces one .di file per
namespace, whereas in C++ people frequently use different
namespaces within the same file.
Andrei
I would argue that this restriction is a benefit not a
disadvantage, one would anyway likely use a tool such as DSTEP to
create the bindings.
I suppose the greatest benefit would be for people which doesn't
use IDE:s, but also compilation time could benefit.
