On 5/1/14, 4:35 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Am Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:02:54 -0700
schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu <seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org>:
To summarize: It provides a function pointer for every unit test to
druntime or user code. This is actually easy to do. Naming tests
requires changes in the parser, but I guess that shouldn't be
difficult either.
That's fantastic, would you be willing to reconsider that work?
Are you still interested in this?
Yes.
I guess we could build a std.test phobos module to completely replace
the current unittest implementation, see:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/ljtbch$lg6$1...@digitalmars.com
This seems to be a better solution, especially considering extension
possibilities.
I think anything that needs more than the user writing unittests and
adding a line somewhere would be suboptimal. Basically we need all we
have now, just run in parallel.
Andrei
