On 5/1/14, 4:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/1/14, 11:49 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-05-01 17:15, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
That's all nice, but I feel we're going gung ho with overengineering
already. If we give unittests names and then offer people a button
"parallelize unittests" to push (don't even specify the number of
threads! let the system figure it out depending on cores), that's a good
step to a better world.
Sure. But on the other hand, why should D not have a great unit testing
framework built-in.
It should. My focus is to get (a) unittest names and (b) parallel
testing into the language ASAP.
Andrei
What's the rush?
