On Friday, 2 May 2014 at 15:03:47 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/2/14, 1:34 AM, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
On Thursday, 1 May 2014 at 21:29:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/1/14, 1:19 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 01:03:06PM -0700, Andrei
Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 5/1/14, 12:52 PM, "Nordlöw" wrote:
into a class. I'm inclined to say that we should outright
prohibit that,
That can't happen.
Why is that?
(1) Too much breakage, (2) would disallow a ton of correct
code, (3)
no reasonable alternative to propose. We'd essentially hang
our users
out to dry. -- Andrei
Isn't this what we're already doing by (eventually) getting
rid of class
dtors?
Not even close. (1) A lot less breakage, (2) disallowed code
was
already not guaranteed to work, (3) reasonable alternatives
exist.
Andrei
I have 165k lines of code to review for that change... I would
not call
it a minor breakage...
I didn't. I said a lot less that straight out disallowing
struct members. -- Andrei
I would also add one point, just because it is not so obvious:
I'll be more than happy to review my company code, if the
proposed solutions about finalisation in class/struct turn out to
take D one step forward being a better programming language.
/Paolo
