On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 18:54:30 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I mean, what the h*ll does this unit test tests:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/master/std/numeric.d#L995
It is explained in comments there. And it won't become more
simple if you add some fancy syntax there. It looks complicated
because it _is_ complicated, not because syntax is bad.
@describe("foo")
This is redundant as D unittest blocks are associated with
symbols they are placed next to.
{
@it("should do something useful") unittest {
This is essentially @name with an overly smart name and weird
attribute placement.
Is not so much different from what you suggested with named
unit tests.
It introduces bunch of artificial annotations for something that
can be taken care of by a single attribute as a side effect. Not
KISS.
