On Thursday, 15 May 2014 at 15:46:13 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/15/14, 6:02 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 at 15:14:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/13/14, 6:43 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On actual topic of next step - I agree with Jacob, removing all internal allocations from Phobos is most beneficial short-term
goal.

That's a given. This task and improving RC don't compete (except, of course, for bearing on the same people). I ask again, who wants to champion std.refcounted? Rainer? Manu? Michel? Are you there? -- Andrei

You should start with at least some sort of design document for what
such module should look like.

The design is part of the championing. But haven't heard a peep - it seems everybody wants to go to heaven, but nobody wants to die :o).

Right now it is not clear to me at all
what kind of improvements are desired within current language limits.

The clarify it to yourself and others. Start with a library approach to making reference counting easy and convenient. Then see how it informs possible language improvements.

Well I have already pointed out my concerns in this thread. Until some solution is found new refcount module doesn't seem worth putting the effort into.

Reply via email to