Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> writes: > On 5/25/14, 7:54 AM, monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d wrote: >> On Saturday, 24 May 2014 at 17:58:08 UTC, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d >> wrote: >>> As discussed a little at the conference, the auto-tester is almost always >>> hardware bound. In >>> other words, it's building flat out 24/7. More hardware == faster updates >>> to build status. If >>> anyone wants to provide hardware to help there's a number of ways to do so. >>> Here's my order of >>> preference: >>> >>> 1) you have a machine you host somewhere and can provide me remote access >>> to. >>> - this could be a bare metal host or a vm >>> >>> At this point, I'd MUCH rather have hardware that doesn't live in my house. >>> I've got too many >>> already. But I also don't want to turn down good equipment. So, please >>> reach out to me privately >>> if you'd like to help out: bra...@puremagic.com >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Brad >> >> Would there be any way to be able to set-up and configure the machines on >> our end, and to "register" >> them into the auto-testers once they are ready to go?
I'd be willing to run some autotesting in my house. Granting remote access, not so much :-) How hard would it be to turn the autotester client into such a pull system? Jerry