Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:18:26 -0400, Daniel Keep
<daniel.keep.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
You can't trivially disambiguate between the getter and the setter with
the current system, either. How is this a new issue?
You can't *trivially* but you can do it (that's another issue that
probably should be addressed in general for overloaded functions).
Agreed. I don't think this is so much an issue with properties as it's
an issue with overloads. A good solution that works really well for
overloads will work well for properties too.
Besides which, why can't you just add this:
__traits(getter, aggregate.property)
Problem solved.
That works too. That's probably the most sensable solution I've seen.
Has my vote.
-Steve
Me too.
--b
