On 5/29/14, 6:50 AM, Wyatt wrote:
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 13:34:26 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Minor point -- is it really going to be the clunky std.experimental,
or is it going to be something elegant like exp.* ... ?
I would prefer the latter. :-)
I think I would too. But failing that, since we have packages now,
would std.experimental.* be an acceptable compromise?
-Wyatt
Last thing we want is a terse nice name for something that's very likely
to change.
Also please don't analyze this to death. It's meant to reduce friction,
not increase this.
Andrei
