On 6/6/2014 9:33 AM, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Robert Schadek via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
The site says it creates recursive decent parser. D does not even fit
into lalr1. So it will not work, unless you can inject handwritten parse
function for the critical parts
Do you know the k value for the D language grammar for a LALR(k) parser?
It's definitely not LALR(1), I imagine GLR would likely work, anything
in between I'm not sure.