On 18/06/14 23:42, Etienne wrote:
I find myself often repeating this boilerplate:if (obj.member !is null) { if (obj.member.nested !is null) { if (obj.member.nested.val !is null) { writeln(obj.member.nested.val); } } } I have to admit it's a little frustrating when you see swift's ?. syntax notation, it would be a little more practical to be able to write writeln(obj.member?.nested?.val); Based on http://appventure.me/2014/06/13/swift-optionals-made-simple/ Any thoughts?
I want non-null in the type system! To put a nullable reference into a non-null variable you need to check first, but from then on the compiler can ensure it's never null!
