On 23 June 2014 23:58, Grogan via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Monday, 23 June 2014 at 22:16:22 UTC, Grogan wrote: >> >> On Monday, 23 June 2014 at 22:02:26 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote: >>>> >>>> import std.stdio; >>>> >>>> @safe int safe() >>>> { >>>> auto i = 8; >>>> return i; >>>> } >>>> >>>> void main(string ars[]) >>>> { >>>> writeln(safe); >>>> >>>> } >>>> --------------------------- >>>> >>>> What you want is just impossible... >>> >>> >>> Would be a good use case for dfix. It really isn't hard to rename every >>> identifier consistently. >> >> >> Maybe the future will tell you you're right... >> From my point of view this change is a very unprobable one but who knows ? >> ^^ >> >> People are skeptikal about the the air-skate too... >> I don't wanna be segregative... > > > I meant the 'hoverboard' of course... > > BTW I think '@' makes sense. And another BTW: in your fantastic nazi plan > which consists into eradicating the '@' prefix, how would look the UDA ? > I mean that '@' has a signification in the D grammar not only for predifined > attributes, but also for user ones... >
Godwin's Law.