On 6/29/14, 11:13 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 07:59 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[…]

A friend who works at a hedge fund (after making the rounds to the NYC
large financial companies) told me that's a myth. Any nontrivial
calculation involving money (interest, fixed income, derivatives, ...)
needs floating point. He never needed more than double.

Very definitely so. Fixed point or integer arithmetic for simple
"household" finance fair enough, but for "finance house" calculations
you generally need 22+ significant denary digits to meet with compliance
requirements.

I don't know of US regulations that ask for such.

What I do know is I gave my hedge fund friend a call (today is his name day so it was as good a pretext as any) and mentioned that some people believe fixed point is used in finance. His answer was:

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

I asked about how they solve accumulating numeric errors and he said it's on a case basis. Most of the time it's pennies for billions of dollars, so nobody cares. Sometimes there are reconciliations needed - so called REC's - that compare and adjust outputs of different algorithms.

One nice war story he recalled: someone was storing the number of seconds as a double, and truncate it to int where needed. An error of at most one second wasn't important in the context. However, sometimes the second was around midnight so an error of one second was an error of one day, which was significant. The solution was to use rounding instead of truncation.


Andrei


Reply via email to