Better AAs

[bearophile via Digitalmars-d]

Recently some people have said that D has about two thousand bugs 
open, so there is no hope to fix them, etc. But not all bugs are 
equally important. Probably less than about one hundred of those 
bugs are significantly important, so if you manage to fix those, 
D becomes something different (some of those bugs are enhancement 
requests).

Lately a bug that has plagued D has apparently being fixed, now D 
is a bit more adult language.

This code:

import std.stdio, std.typecons;
struct Foo { string s; }
alias Bar = Tuple!string;
auto s1 = "he";
auto s2 = "llo";
void main() {
    int[Foo] aa1;
    aa1[Foo("hello")] = 1;
    aa1[Foo(s1 ~ s2)] = 2;
    aa1.writeln;
    int[Bar] aa2;
    aa2[Bar("hello")] = 1;
    aa2[Bar(s1 ~ s2)] = 2;
    aa2.writeln;
}


Now compiles and outputs something right:

[Foo("hello"):2]
[Tuple!string("hello"):2]

More problems are left in the D AAs, but now you can actually 
start using D associative arrays in your code.

Rust has not done the significant D design mistake of putting the 
associative arrays inside the language/runtime, but D AAs are 
getting better.

Bye,
bearophile