On 7/9/2014 1:58 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
I think it still mostly comes down to marketing :-) That said,
we're pretty close in D once my Scheduler pull request is
accepted. Between that and the Generator type in the same pull
request,
Ah, I didn't know you had a PR request already! Awesome!
> we're not missing much but the weird switch syntax they have.
I'm not concerned about the syntax. Any syntax we use should be "D style"
syntax, not "Go style".
> There's still some work to do, but I think a lot of it
> really comes down to showing people what's already possible in D
> rather than writing more code.
I agree.
