On Sunday, 13 July 2014 at 12:18:40 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-07-13 13:57, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
Anyone else?
I agree with Sönke.
if I change it back, people will argue that that is redundant
and
unintuitive. Than I will change it back again and the
discussion starts
again.
"logError" is a lot more clear and descriptive. I think that's
important. If people don't like that they can use an alias.
I see a lot of people pushing for opposite changes that would
make Robert make full circle:
- info/warning/error cs logInfo/logWarning/logError
- infof/warnf/errorf vs info/warn/error (formatted the default)
- removing conditionals overloads vs having conditional overloads
with own name vs having conditional overloads with same name
Not everyone will ever get satisfied.
